His music was headed toward disinterestedness – which is not "indifference," the word that keeps cropping up in academic writing on Cage. From the standpoint of spiritual practice, the two words having nothing in common. Indifference borders on nihilism. It has a quality of "not caring." It is "apathetic." It expresses corrosive cynicism. Ultimately, it is poisonous, both to the practitioner and to the culture as a whole."It may not be that Cage didn't care about the audience, but perhaps was showing his own stupidity in not understanding their needs. He even faced away from them during the performance, creating more and more barriers to their understanding. Either way, he demonstrated a mighty ego in criticizing their responses as "stupid criticisms." Yes, the audience showed signs of closed-mindedness, but so did Cage in his own responses.
Perceptions about music, perceptions that affect music, perceptions colored by music, perceptions expressed by music.
Showing posts with label John Cage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Cage. Show all posts
Monday, July 09, 2012
Where the Heart Beats 7
Chapter 6, "Ego Noise (1950-1951)" begins the second section of the book, where the mountains are no longer mountains. Many characters are introduced, and I'm noticing a pattern in these introductions that gets annoying in its repetitiveness. A leap back in time to show the origins of a particular character's interest in Zen, or in contemporary music, or in contemporary art, traced forwards to that character's meeting with one of the more major figures of the book. I'm also annoyed by the shifts between past and present tense, often within the same paragraph. Speaking of ego noise, these imperfections pull me out of a merged contemplation with the subject, instead becoming aware of the writing as writing, rather than as ideas expressed. This is also the problem with the structure, such as on page 193. This was the end of a fascinating description of Cage's fourth lecture of "Empty Words" at the Naropa Buddhist Center in Colorado. The quotes by Cage disrupt the narrative, muddying the idea that the Buddhist leader, Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche, had liked the confrontation of ego noise spurred by Cage's lecture performance. The author both clouds the punchline, and avoids addressing Cage's misunderstanding of his audience and Trungpa's delight in ego noise. Why is this ego noise good, if the goal is to avoid ego noise? Why doesn't Cage appreciate this ego noise? Why is the audience stupid for not being part of Cage's journey through Thoreau? (I'm using questions, just as the author likes to do when discussing Zen.)
That last question reflects my frustration with Cage. He wants to create music that opens the mind, but he is unwilling to provide the same help that he got in his own spiritual journey. The four lectures go through a process of winnowing Thoreau's words, what Cage envisioned as clouds dissipating. But he got to see the beautiful cloud shapes first, before they dissolved. By delivering only the fourth lecture, Cage was doing the equivalent of showing a picture of a tiny wisp of cloud and saying, "look at that beautiful big shape!" I'm very intrigued by the lectures, but I feel that Cage was not only disinterested, but also indifferent to the audience. From page 136:
Where the Heart Beats 6
The fifth chapter ends the first section of the book, but rather than feeling like a conclusion, it seems to be setting the stage for future developments. Cage's introduction to Hinduism is explored, as well as his lectures at Black Mountain College and The Club. He meets Morton Feldman and reads Zen books at the Orientalia. The chapter, "Seeking Silence" twists through time, jumping around not just in the titled era (1946-1950) but also forward to 1989 and back to 1907. This destroys a sense of narrative, just like in the first chapter.
The descriptions of Ramakrishna's Hinduism and Meister Eckhart's Mysticism are fascinating, and Cage's development of his new artistic philosophy, "[music should] sober and quiet the mind, thus rendering it susceptible to divine influences," is laid out clearly.
Where the Heart Beats 5
"Chapter 4: Four Walls (1942-1946)" describes a very emotionally turbulent time in John Cage's life. Different stories are told of how his marriage to Xenia fell apart, both from her perspective and from his. Regardless of whose fault it was, it was clear that Cage was scared of the social dangers inherent in his homosexuality, but also became aware that he could no longer deny those feelings. The author uses Henry Cowell's conviction on child molestation as an illustration of Cage's thinking. Cowell had been driven by social taboos to seek sexual gratification with 17-year-old bullies in his neighborhood, rather than to enjoy physical affection with a peer. The author suggests that his sentence of 15 years was caused more by Cowell's self-loathing about his sexual attractions to men than by the justice system's concern for the safety of the teenagers. This self-loathing may be what Cage feared he could descend into, accompanied by the professional destruction that Cowell faced.
While I'm still not happy with the author's descriptions of Cage's music, it is not because she is not trying. She quotes performers and critics in efforts to describe Four Walls, The Perilous Night, and Ophelia, as well as including her own emotional impressions. What frustrates me as a music theorist is that there is little or no detail on the musical structures themselves that create these impressions. I want to know what type of chord is repeated att he end of Four Walls, what the melody line is, how much of the structure was determined by Cage and how much by the performer.
Larson does do a good job in showing how Cage's personal concerns affected his aesthetic philosophy, as he became concerned that the emotional energy he poured into his works was not recognized by the audience, critics, and fellow artists. It was in this personal and artistic confusion that Cage found Zen Buddhism to be a lifeline; a way to survive the divorce from Xenia, a way to come to terms with his sexuality, a way to find better reasons for writing music.
While I'm still not happy with the author's descriptions of Cage's music, it is not because she is not trying. She quotes performers and critics in efforts to describe Four Walls, The Perilous Night, and Ophelia, as well as including her own emotional impressions. What frustrates me as a music theorist is that there is little or no detail on the musical structures themselves that create these impressions. I want to know what type of chord is repeated att he end of Four Walls, what the melody line is, how much of the structure was determined by Cage and how much by the performer.
Larson does do a good job in showing how Cage's personal concerns affected his aesthetic philosophy, as he became concerned that the emotional energy he poured into his works was not recognized by the audience, critics, and fellow artists. It was in this personal and artistic confusion that Cage found Zen Buddhism to be a lifeline; a way to survive the divorce from Xenia, a way to come to terms with his sexuality, a way to find better reasons for writing music.
Friday, July 06, 2012
Where the Heart Beats 4
Chapter 3 of Kay Larson's book, Where The Heart Beats, is titled "Merce Cunningham" even though he is not a major character of the chapter. Yes, this is the first time Cage meets him, but their connection is not significant at this point. Rather, it is Cage's connections to dancers such as Bonnie Bird and Martha Graham, and artists like Mark Tobey that influenced his life at this point. Larson describes the visual arts very well, and the dance repertoire adequately. But her musings on Cage's music itself is lacking. She makes the claim that Cage invented live electronic music in 1939 with Imaginary Landscape #1, showing no awareness of the theremin (invented in 1919) or the ondes martenot (invented in 1928). And her descriptions of the invention of the prepared piano lack the momentousness that this amazing development deserves. The interaction between Zen and Dada is very interesting, and I'm amazed at the luck Cage had to be in the right place at the right time. He got hired at the Cornish School of the Arts, the location of the first radio lab in the country. He was involved in a summer percussion concert at Mills College that suddenly became a Bauhaus workshop with the arrival of László Moholy-Nagy. Granted, Cage did exhibit courage to make his own opportunities, by moving to New York with no money, only a shady promise from Max Ernst for housing.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Where the Heart Beats 3
Chapter 2 is entitled "John Cage 1912-1938." Considerably longer than the first chapter, it is broken into different titled sections: "The View From Pacific Palisades," "The Shape of the Future 1: Men," "The Shape of the Future 2: Music," "The Shape of the Future 3: Art," "Buddha of the Bathroom," "Luigi Russolo," "Arnold Schoenberg," "Oskar Fischinger," and "Walking Water Walk." Many more Cage quotes are used to create pseudo-conversation. The opening sections have fascinating descriptions of Cage's early adult life. He really bluffed his way into just about every aspect of his life, from painting to music to love. I had no idea that Cage got married, though the author uses quotes to make the very good point about the underground lifestyle forced upon homosexuals in the 1930s that Cage found untenable. Plus it sounds like he was very confused about his whole sexual identity, falling into and out of love very quickly. Slowly, as Cage encounters more movers and shakers of the avant-garde, he moves from dabbling dilettante to serious practitioner. And the seeds of his influences from Dada and Futurism are explored, though more from the perspective of Marcel Duchamp and Luigi Rossolo than from Cage's perspective (so far). There are hints of the connections to Buddhism as well. The quotes flow much better than in the first chapter, and the chapter ends with a tease about Cage's later success with Water Walk to show the results of those early influences.
Friday, June 22, 2012
Where the Heart Beats 2
Chapter 1 is part of the first section: Mountains are Mountains. Everything is as we understand it, before Zen makes us unpack everything. D. T. Suzuki is introduced through his influences on the Beat Generation, notably Gary Snyder, Allan Ginsberg, and Jack Kerouac. With the Beat set up, suddenly we are shifted to Project Manhattan and Robert Oppenheimer for a brief look at Dr. Atomic's association with Vishnu, before sweeping over to Japan for a biographical account of Suzuki's early life. The descriptions of life in a Zen temple are very appealing. They filled me with peace, and got me thinking about starting to meditate again. I'm also impressed by Suzuki's dedication to Zen, even though he never formally became a monk. While at university, he would walk over 30 miles to sit zazen (meditate) instead of going to class. He was brought to the U.S. by the abbot of his temple, Soyen Shaku, to serve as a translator both for Soyen and for Paul Carus, who wanted to translate ancient Buddhist works into English. Suzuki is portrayed as an incredible workaholic. He translated many works, wrote his own texts, and traveled all over the world to study different philosophies and to give lectures on Zen Buddhism.
After 14 pages, Cage is allowed to quote a koan as part of the supposed conversation on which this book is structured. But the author does not respond to this quote as part of a dialogue. Rather, she explains where Cage heard that koan, and some of the first works Cage composed based on Buddhist ideas. The chapter ends with another koan, written as if Cage is quoting it, but not why.
I'm intrigued by Suzuki's story, and want to hear more about how he influenced Cage. But the structure of this book is bothering me. Perhaps I'm being too Western-minded, expecting a linear logic that isn't appropriate here. But I certainly feel that the author is flitting from subject to subject without making clear transitions.
After 14 pages, Cage is allowed to quote a koan as part of the supposed conversation on which this book is structured. But the author does not respond to this quote as part of a dialogue. Rather, she explains where Cage heard that koan, and some of the first works Cage composed based on Buddhist ideas. The chapter ends with another koan, written as if Cage is quoting it, but not why.
I'm intrigued by Suzuki's story, and want to hear more about how he influenced Cage. But the structure of this book is bothering me. Perhaps I'm being too Western-minded, expecting a linear logic that isn't appropriate here. But I certainly feel that the author is flitting from subject to subject without making clear transitions.
Where the Heart Beats 1
Several months ago I was asked to write a review of Where the Heart Beats: John Cage, Zen Buddhism, and the Inner Life of Artists by Kay Larson. I just got the book last week, and started reading it. Since I haven't been blogging much lately, I thought I would do a "live blog reading" of the book, posting my impressions with each chapter, instead of waiting until I was done to give an overall review. The book is in fifteen chapters, plus a prelude, epilogue, and the Maha Prajna Paramita Heart Sutra.
The prelude introduces the three main characters in the book: John Cage, Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki, and the author herself. The description of Suzuki is intriguing, telling that he was not a Zen master, though still considered an expert on Zen. He was not formally educated, but clearly a master of languages, having taught himself Sanskrit, Tibetan Sanskrit, and Pali, and fluent in Japanese, English, classical Chinese, and "several European languages." It certainly makes me want to learn more about him. The introduction of John Cage did not teach me anything new, and did not do much to evoke the avant-garde sense of wonder that I associate with his works. 4'33" is naturally given the main stage, but just a taste is given. Perhaps the book will delve more deeply later, giving only a teasing taste in this Prelude. The author describes her own path to Buddhism, and explains the structure of the book. Grouped in three sections, the chapters are meant to follow a Buddhist arc of revelation. And within the chapters, quotes from Cage are used to create a sense of conversation with the author. This could work, or be very annoying as a conceit. I shall see.
The prelude introduces the three main characters in the book: John Cage, Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki, and the author herself. The description of Suzuki is intriguing, telling that he was not a Zen master, though still considered an expert on Zen. He was not formally educated, but clearly a master of languages, having taught himself Sanskrit, Tibetan Sanskrit, and Pali, and fluent in Japanese, English, classical Chinese, and "several European languages." It certainly makes me want to learn more about him. The introduction of John Cage did not teach me anything new, and did not do much to evoke the avant-garde sense of wonder that I associate with his works. 4'33" is naturally given the main stage, but just a taste is given. Perhaps the book will delve more deeply later, giving only a teasing taste in this Prelude. The author describes her own path to Buddhism, and explains the structure of the book. Grouped in three sections, the chapters are meant to follow a Buddhist arc of revelation. And within the chapters, quotes from Cage are used to create a sense of conversation with the author. This could work, or be very annoying as a conceit. I shall see.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Isn't it beautiful?
This post is precluded by a bleg to go vote for me at the Spring For Music Art Blogging Contest. It seems that you can vote at least once every day.
When I was in college, I took a course on the Psychology of Music, mostly as a lark. It fulfilled part of my liberal arts requirements, while still standing one foot in my beloved subject of music. Little did I know that the things I learned there would stick, waiting to surface five years later when I started the graduate program in music theory at Eastman. I still have a vivid memory of that first day in Psychology of Music, when Professor Rew-Gottfried asked us to define "music." I offered up the definition, "Sound organized to be beautiful." Some of my fellow music majors disagreed, saying they had heard and played plenty of ugly music. But that is not an argument against beautiful music, that is an argument against pretty music. I believe that beauty does not preclude ugliness. Instead, artistic beauty is that which touches us emotionally. We can be horrified by beauty, challenged by it, envious, sad, or angry because of it. So, is there unbeautiful music, music which does not create an emotional response? I believe there is not. We humans are not emotionally monolithic. One person's garbage, another person's treasure, etc etc. As long as someone hears some organized sound and feels something because of it, that sound is music.
This definition requires an unpacking of "organized sound." Someone might be eagerly raising their cyberhand with the example of John Cage's 4'33", the notorious silent piece. Or perhaps they have examples of purely randomized sound used in a piece. In any case of a composed piece, there is a person who came up with an idea and notated it in some way. This is a means of organization. With 4'33", Cage had the idea of chopping an audience's attention into three sections of time, organizing our perception in this way. And the piece is not really about silence, but about environmental sounds. When audiences are forced to keep themselves silent, focused on what they are really hearing, all the little creaks and squeaks become obvious. Cage could not control what particular sounds are heard, but he made sure the audience did hear these sounds, within an allotted time period.
In the case of an improvised work, the performer is the organizer. It may be completely unplanned, and yet the performer is making choices of what to play and what not to play. Even a computer generating randomized (or seemingly random) bursts of noise has been programmed by someone. And as long as someone listening to those bursts has an emotional response, it is music.
So when I wrote "the major point of the program, to bring beautiful music to the people who need it most," I meant music that maximizes a) the number of people with an emotional response, and b) the magnitude of the emotional response. I'll admit that I have a predilection against music that creates only a "horror" response. But sprinkling pain with pleasure, horror and ecstasy, can be a powerful and moving experience. I'm talking about music here, people! Now, go vote for me.
When I was in college, I took a course on the Psychology of Music, mostly as a lark. It fulfilled part of my liberal arts requirements, while still standing one foot in my beloved subject of music. Little did I know that the things I learned there would stick, waiting to surface five years later when I started the graduate program in music theory at Eastman. I still have a vivid memory of that first day in Psychology of Music, when Professor Rew-Gottfried asked us to define "music." I offered up the definition, "Sound organized to be beautiful." Some of my fellow music majors disagreed, saying they had heard and played plenty of ugly music. But that is not an argument against beautiful music, that is an argument against pretty music. I believe that beauty does not preclude ugliness. Instead, artistic beauty is that which touches us emotionally. We can be horrified by beauty, challenged by it, envious, sad, or angry because of it. So, is there unbeautiful music, music which does not create an emotional response? I believe there is not. We humans are not emotionally monolithic. One person's garbage, another person's treasure, etc etc. As long as someone hears some organized sound and feels something because of it, that sound is music.
This definition requires an unpacking of "organized sound." Someone might be eagerly raising their cyberhand with the example of John Cage's 4'33", the notorious silent piece. Or perhaps they have examples of purely randomized sound used in a piece. In any case of a composed piece, there is a person who came up with an idea and notated it in some way. This is a means of organization. With 4'33", Cage had the idea of chopping an audience's attention into three sections of time, organizing our perception in this way. And the piece is not really about silence, but about environmental sounds. When audiences are forced to keep themselves silent, focused on what they are really hearing, all the little creaks and squeaks become obvious. Cage could not control what particular sounds are heard, but he made sure the audience did hear these sounds, within an allotted time period.
In the case of an improvised work, the performer is the organizer. It may be completely unplanned, and yet the performer is making choices of what to play and what not to play. Even a computer generating randomized (or seemingly random) bursts of noise has been programmed by someone. And as long as someone listening to those bursts has an emotional response, it is music.
So when I wrote "the major point of the program, to bring beautiful music to the people who need it most," I meant music that maximizes a) the number of people with an emotional response, and b) the magnitude of the emotional response. I'll admit that I have a predilection against music that creates only a "horror" response. But sprinkling pain with pleasure, horror and ecstasy, can be a powerful and moving experience. I'm talking about music here, people! Now, go vote for me.
Wednesday, September 05, 2007
What's out there
A colleague in the math department sent me this link to a great explanation of violin acoustics.
Stephen Casales has finished the Unfinished Symphony.
Stephen Casales has finished the Unfinished Symphony.
Composer, teacher and critic Stephen Casale studied theory and composition at the New England Conservatory of Music and musicology at New York University. The project to realize a performing version of the Scherzo movement of Schubert's "Unfinished" symphony based on Schubert's piano sketch for the movement took shape in Martin Chusid's graduate course on Schubert at NYU, where it was performed in 1978. A studio recording of the Scherzo was subsequently made by the Czech Radio Symphony under Vladimir Valek in 1995. The present performance by the Toronto Philharmonia is the first professional concert presentation of this realization of the movement.
A new e-company is trying to connect music instructors with students at ClickForLessons. I have no idea how effective it is.
This Saturday there is a symposium celebrating John Cage's 95th birthday at the University of New Hampshire.
John Cage in 2007: Reception, Performance Practice, Analysis
Symposium, 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., M-223, Paul Creative Arts Center, UNH
Our Memory of What Happened is Not What Happened: Cage and the Power of Myth
Brent Reidy, Ph.D. candidate, Musicology, Indiana University
On John Cage's Late Music, Analysis, and the Model of Renga in Two2
Rob Haskins, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Music, UNH
Interdeterminacy and Performance Practice in Cage?s _Variations_
David P. Miller, Boston, MA
Thinking About Cage and Nature, Back Then and Right Now
David Andrew, Ph.D., Professor of Art History, UNH
Concert, 8:00 p.m., Bratton Recital Hall, Paul Creative Arts Center, UNH
Music for One
Margaret Herlehy, Oboe
Four6
Rob Haskins, David Miller, Laurel Karlik Sheehan, and Brent Reidy, performers
Two2
Rob Haskins and Laurel Karlik Sheehan, pianos
Monday, June 11, 2007
Wherefore Art?
Dave Munger can't just enjoy his vacation, but must pose vexing questions. The comments bring up Cage as a musical referent. Join the fun, and list your own definitions of art. I wrestle with whether there needs to be a creator. Can something accidentally created or naturally occurring be labeled art? I suppose it comes down to a person framing the creation within an artistic perspective, regardless of how the framed thing came into being. And by framing I'm not talking wood and gold paint, but someone standing up and saying, "This I call art. I have placed boundaries on this thing, and regard it as aesthetic." Thus Cage placed boundaries on a period of ambient noise and performance expectations, challenging us to experience it aesthetically.
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
FriPod: Top 10
Last year I wrote a post listing my top 10 iTunes tracks. Here are this year's Top 10. None of them were on last year's list.
1. Ayre: Luna Golijov
2. Suonata a 7 Con due Trombe: 1. Grave Franceschini
3. Creep - Edmund Welles
4. Concerning Hobbits - Howard Shore
5. Sonatas and Interludes #5 - John Cage
6. Down To the River To Pray - Oh Brother Where Art Thou? soundtrack
7. Ah! stigie larve / Gia latta Cerbero / Ma la furia / Vaghe pupil - Handel
8. Hope and Memory - Howard Shore
9. Ayre: Sueltate las cintas - Golijov
10. Twilight And Shadow - Howard Shore
1. Ayre: Luna Golijov
2. Suonata a 7 Con due Trombe: 1. Grave Franceschini
3. Creep - Edmund Welles
4. Concerning Hobbits - Howard Shore
5. Sonatas and Interludes #5 - John Cage
6. Down To the River To Pray - Oh Brother Where Art Thou? soundtrack
7. Ah! stigie larve / Gia latta Cerbero / Ma la furia / Vaghe pupil - Handel
8. Hope and Memory - Howard Shore
9. Ayre: Sueltate las cintas - Golijov
10. Twilight And Shadow - Howard Shore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)